Prejudice

I was told by my coworker today when I was at the magic shop that a Taiwanese friend of mine was critizied by some local Hong Kong magicians in a forum. The story was like this:

A local magic hobbist purchased a set of lecture notes of this Taiwanese friend, he then praised my friend's works in the forum, and that, of course, is the beginning of a series negative feedbacks from other magicians, they said something like:

1) what's the point of learning a new impossible location trick?

My Ans: Ask Max Maven

2) what's the point of getting a new method to seperate the reds from blacks by the magician?

My Ans: Ask Lennart Green and Harry Lorayne

3) It's not important to achieve the said effect with normal deck, spectators won't know the method anyway...

My Ans: I don't even want to answer this question

4) A trick shouldn't be considered as a good one just because it "fools" you...

My Ans: Partially agree, but...this comment is only valid when certain conditions are meet

5) Out of this world is 9 times better than the magician himself seperating red &black trick, plus the presentation of displaying memory skills is not appealing

My Ans: Ask Lennart Green, Koysta Kimlet & Simon Aronson

6) what's the point of producing four Aces first, and then lose them into the deck and find them out again?

My Ans: Yeah, you should keep performing the classic version Henry Christ's Fabulous Aces with spelling english names and words for Chinese spectators!

Yes, you guys are entitled to your opinions, but !!!! What the fuck?!!! without actually seeing the performance of these effects, without purchasing his lecture notes, without knowing the differences between his method and the published ones, what's the basis for you guys to judge his works???!!!